Dr. Marshall’s Nonresponse & Use of Sedevacantist Arguments; Fr. Nix on Fr. Heers & the Catechism

Michael Lofton addresses Taylor Marshall’s attempt to defend Archbishop Vigano from the concern that he may be saying the antichrist will sit in the chair of St. Peter. He then shows that Taylor Marshall skips the very text that gave the most concern. He also addresses Marshall’s explanation of St. Bellarmine’s view on a heretical pope and shows how his failure to understand the term “manifest heretic” makes Marshall’s argument in favor of Sedevacantism. He lastly addresses Fr. David Nix’s praise of Fr. Peter Heers and also his comments that the Catechism of the Council of Trent was infallibly defined by a pope.

Leave a Reply